Recently a new gym opened near my home. I had just starting gym training again at another gym but because this new gym was closer to home and at my preferred shopping centre I decided changing gyms might boost my motivation. Well that was the excuse but the new gym had a special deal going which meant lower subscriptions and no sign up fee which certainly encouraged the change. Another big advantage of a new gym is low membership. It is working out well because I never have to wait to use a machine, there isn't a lot of talking within earshot, and having sub-clinical ADHD the lack of distraction keeps me focused.
Showing posts with label health news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health news. Show all posts
Saturday, January 8, 2022
Sunday, March 13, 2011
A Counter Intuitive Study on Longevity
There is no easy way to establish strategies for living a long life. This news release adds to our confusion. I proffer the following cautions:
The new release does not point to a published paper, the results are being published in book form. I would much prefer that they first publish a series of papers then publish their book. By publishing the book first they are putting out a view on longevity that has not been subject to (1) above.
For myself at least I have to disregard the claims of this news article. Yes I can see elements that I find plausible but in the absence of a series of papers that have been subject to critical review and discussion by a wide range of people it is virtually impossible to know if all their conclusions are valid.
There is a good lesson here in relation to health news. There are also sorts of claims being made about the secrets to longevity. There are no secrets, we're still learning, but obviously a good deal of common sense goes a very long way. Eat well, exercise regularly, and don't go looking for fountains of longevity.
- This study contradicts many other studies. When that occurs don't accept the study at face value, it needs to be subject to critical review by many people, and believe me that is far superior to peer review!
- This study is relying on data gathered a very long time ago, when experimental methods were much less refined than today.
- It relates to analysis of "more than 1500 bright children". Small sample, and just what do they mean by "bright".
The new release does not point to a published paper, the results are being published in book form. I would much prefer that they first publish a series of papers then publish their book. By publishing the book first they are putting out a view on longevity that has not been subject to (1) above.
For myself at least I have to disregard the claims of this news article. Yes I can see elements that I find plausible but in the absence of a series of papers that have been subject to critical review and discussion by a wide range of people it is virtually impossible to know if all their conclusions are valid.
There is a good lesson here in relation to health news. There are also sorts of claims being made about the secrets to longevity. There are no secrets, we're still learning, but obviously a good deal of common sense goes a very long way. Eat well, exercise regularly, and don't go looking for fountains of longevity.
Friday, July 30, 2010
Bad Science by Ben Goldacre
bad science
Dr. Ben Goldacre
Fourth Estate - London, 2008
Website: Bad Science
Purpose of this text: to inform the general public about how to better understand modern biomedical news and in particular health related news. He is a British doctor and keeps his focus on the British scene but his lessons are universal and badly needed. In an earlier post I made some comments on the chapter in this text "Professor Patrick Holford".
This is a very important book. If you have never read a text on how to read and understand biomedical literature yet read biomedical literature you should read this text.
at
6:57 PM
Posted by
John
0
comments
Labels:
alternative medicine,
epistemology,
health news,
homeopathy,
MMR,
public health
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)